Featured Post

Holobionts: a new Paradigm to Understand the Role of Humankind in the Ecosystem

You are a holobiont, I am a holobiont, we are all holobionts. "Holobiont" means, literally, "whole living creature." It ...

Thursday, February 2, 2023

Those Pesky Savanna Monkeys: The New Large Igneous Province

 


This is the second part of a short series dedicated to the "Savanna Monkeys," aka "homo sapiens". In the previous post, I described how they evolved and how they changed Earth's ecosystem in the process. Here, we take a peek at the future. The monkeys could really do a lot of damage. 


The giant volcanic eruptions called LIPs tend to appear on our planet at intervals of the order of tens or hundreds of million years. They are huge events that cause the melting of the surface of entire continents. The results are devastating: of course, everything organic on the path of the growing lava mass is destroyed and sterilized, but the planet-wide effect of the eruption is even more destructive. LIPs are believed to warm coal beds at sufficiently high temperatures that they catch fire. These enormous fires draw down oxygen from the atmosphere, turning it into CO2. The result is an intense global warming, accompanied by anoxia. In the case of the largest of these events, the End-Permian extinction of some 250 million years ago, the whole biosphere seriously risked being sterilized. Fortunately, it recovered and we are still here, but it was a close call. 

LIPs are believed to be the result of internal movements of the Earth's core. For some reason, giant lava plumes tend to develop and move toward the surface. It is the same mechanism that generates volcanoes, just on a much larger scale. From what we know, LIPs are unpredictable, although they may be correlated to a "blanketing effect" generated by the dance of the continents on Earth's surface. When the continents are clustered together, they tend to warm the mantle below, and that may be the origin of the plume that creates the LIP

Of course, if a LIP were to take place nowadays, the results would be a little catastrophic -- possibly more catastrophic than the fantasy of Hollywood's movie makers can imagine. They have thrown all sorts of disasters at hapless humans, from tsunamis to entire asteroids. But imagine the whole North American continent becoming a red-hot lava basin, well, that's truly catastrophic!

Fortunately, LIPs are slow geological processes and even if there is one more of these events in our future, it won't happen on the time scale of human lifetimes. But that doesn't mean that humans, those pesky Savanna Monkeys, can't do their best to create something similar. And, yes, they are engaged in the remarkable feat of creating a LIP-equivalent by burning huge amounts of organic ("fossil") carbon that had sedimented underground over tens or hundreds of millions of years of biological activity. 

It is remarkable how rapid the monkey LIP has been. Geological LIPs typically span millions of years. The monkey LIP went through its cycle over a few hundred years: we see it developing right now. It will be over when the concentration of fossil carbon stored in the crust will become too low to self-sustain the combustion with atmospheric oxygen. Just like all fires, the great fire of fossil carbon will end when it runs out of fuel, probably less than a century from now. Even in such a short time, the concentration of CO2 is likely to reach, and perhaps exceed, levels never seen after the Eocene, some 50 million years ago. It is not impossible that it could reach more than 1000 parts per million. 

There is always the possibility that such a high carbon concentration in the atmosphere will push Earth over the edge of stability and kill Gaia by overheating the planet. But that's not a very interesting scenario: we all die and that's it. So, let's examine the possibility that the biosphere will survive the great carbon pulse generated by the savanna monkeys. What's going to happen?

The savanna monkeys themselves are likely to be the first victims of the CO2 pulse that they generated. Without the fossil fuels they have come to rely on, their numbers are going to decline very rapidly. From the incredible number of 8 billion individuals, that they recently reached, they are going to return to levels typical of their early savanna ancestors: maybe just a few tens of thousands. Quite possibly, they'll go extinct. In any case, they will hardly be able to keep their habit of razing down entire forests. Without monkeys engaged in the cutting business and with high concentrations of CO2, forests are advantaged over savannas, and they are likely to recolonize the land, and we are going to see again a lush, forested planet (arboreal monkeys will probably survive and thrive). Nevertheless, savannas will not disappear. They are part of the ecosystem, and new megaherbivores feeding on them will evolve in a few hundred thousand years. 

Over deep time, the great cycle of warming and cooling may restart after the monkey LIP is over, just as it did for the "natural" geological LIPs. In a few million years, Earth may be seeing a new cooling cycle that will lead again to a Pleistocene-like series of ice ages. At that point, new savanna monkeys may evolve. They may restart their habit of exterminating the megafauna, burning forests and building things in stone. But they won't have the same abundance of fossil fuel that the monkeys called "Homo sapiens" found when they emerged into the savannas. So, their impact on the ecosystem will be smaller, and they won't be able to create a new monkey-LIP. 

And then what? In deep time, the destiny of Earth is determined by the slowly increasing solar irradiation that is going, eventually, to eliminate all the oxygen from the atmosphere and sterilize the biosphere, maybe in less than a billion years from now. So, we may be seeing more cycles of warming and cooling before Earth's ecosystem collapses. At that point, there will be no more forests, no more animals, and only single-celled life may persist. It has to be. Gaia, poor lady, is doing what she can to keep the biosphere alive, but she is not all-powerful. And not immortal, either. 

Nevertheless, the future is always full of surprises, and you should never underestimate how clever and resourceful Gaia is. Think of how she reacted to the CO2 starvation of the past few tens of millions of years. She came up with not just one, but two brand-new photosynthesis mechanisms designed to operate at low CO2 concentrations: the C4 mechanism typical of grasses, and another one called crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM). To say nothing about how the fungal-plant symbiosis in the rhizosphere has been evolving with new tricks and new mechanisms. You can't imagine what the old lady may concoct in her garage together with her Elf scientists (those who also work part-time for Santa Claus). 

Now, what if Gaia invents something even more radical in terms of photosynthesis? One possibility would be for trees to adopt the C4 mechanism and create new forests that would be more resilient against low CO2 concentrations. But we may think of even more radical innovations. How about a light fixation pathway that doesn't just work with less CO2, but that doesn't even need CO2? That would be nearly miraculous but, remarkably, that pathway exists. And it has been developed exactly by those savanna monkeys who have been tinkering with -- and mainly ruining -- the ecosphere. 

The new photosynthetic pathway doesn't even use carbon molecules but does the trick with solid silicon (the monkeys call it "photovoltaics"). It stores solar energy as excited electrons that can be kept for a long time in the form of reduced metals or other chemical species. The creatures using this mechanism don't need carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, don't need water, and they may get along even without oxygen. What the new creatures can do is hard to imagine for us (although we may try). 

In any case, Gaia is a tough lady, and she may survive much longer than we may imagine, even to a sun hot enough to torch the biosphere to cinders. Forests are Gaia's creatures, and she is benevolent and merciful (not always, though), so she may keep them with her for a long, long time. (and, who knows, she may even spare the savanna monkeys from her wrath!). 


We may be savanna monkeys, but we remain awed by the majesty of forests. The image of a fantasy forest from Hayao Miyazaki's movie, "Mononoke no Hime" resonates a lot with us.


12 comments:

  1. Such a nice clean looking photovoltaic pic....total deception for the poisoning of the water supplies, the destruction of the land for mining for them (and the air pollution in those locations....the batteries...the killing of the indigenous to get them off the land, the coups against democratic governments to steal toxic resources...Nice...Nice for people who don't want, once again, to think about the death they are pushing. Because....because...we must have an answer...any deceptive answer will do.

    C.

    C.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, as soon as the brush strokes are a little less broad, the poisoning caused by non-biological processes becomes apparent. This is a poisoning of life forms. It excludes life forms from the sterile pits and vast barren deserts.

      Delete
    2. LIP = Large Igneous Province
      We're "Fire Apes", aren't we? Is this a "controlled burn"?

      We are accustomed to looking only at certain time frames.
      Geological history is this big, time-compressed grab-bag, which we apply to our near-future, as defined by human life-span.
      It's hard to get the context right, and it actually pays to get the context wrong, "perverse incentives".

      What's a "good" Fire Ape to do?
      I grow vegetable gardens. It's not a bad thing to do, anyway.

      The Princess Mononoke scene is lovely. That's a fine movie, not just for kids, but adults, also.

      John Day
      drjohnsblog.substack.com

      Delete
    3. We've got to get rid of our juvenile habit of setting everything on fire. Or else....

      Delete
  2. I will only post one of these pieces on toxics and photovoltaics...and not start with the trail of the mining and there is no known end to the trail of the disintegration pollution since it is too early to know.https://www.cfact.org/2019/09/15/the-solar-panel-toxic-waste-problem/

    C.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That article is a silly piece of propaganda. PV panels do not contain, nor produce toxic waste. They can be recycled, and they use only minerals that are abundant in Earth's crust. They are friendly to the environment because give to the savanna monkeys a chance to have energy without needing to cut trees. Propaganda is an evil beast...

      Delete
  3. I'm sorry. I read about the PV panels and the water supply for quite some time when I was teaching environmental law and water law in Cairo. It is not propaganda just because you don't want to believe it and I limit my comment to one example of writing. Poisoning the water supply to manufacture PV panels will put the savanna monkeys out of business for good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please, Christine: use your brain for once. What would be the "toxic waste" that panels release? Do you know what panels are made of? Just silicon, oxygen, traces of aluminum. None of these elements is toxic. There is no way to poison the water supply to manufacture PV panels. Can it be, for once, that a lie is not replaced by a parallel and opposite lie? For once.....

      Delete
    2. Solar panels are composed of photovoltaic (PV) cells that convert sunlight to electricity. When these panels enter landfills, valuable resources go to waste. And because solar panels contain toxic materials like lead that can leach out as they break down, landfilling also creates new environmental hazards...
      ..At a typical e-waste facility, this high-tech sandwich will be treated crudely. Recyclers often take off the panel’s frame and its junction box to recover the aluminum and copper, then shred the rest of the module, including the glass, polymers, and silicon cells, which get coated in a silver electrode and soldered using tin and lead. (Because the vast majority of that mixture by weight is glass, the resultant product is considered an impure, crushed glass.) Tao and his colleagues estimate that a recycler taking apart a standard 60-cell silicon panel can get about $3 for the recovered aluminum, copper, and glass. Vanderhoof, meanwhile, says that the cost of recycling that panel in the US is between $12 and $25—after transportation costs, which “oftentimes equal the cost to recycle.” At the same time, in states that allow it, it typically costs less than a dollar to dump a solar panel in a solid-waste landfill.
      “We believe the big blind spot in the US for recycling is that the cost far exceeds the revenue,” Meng said. “It’s on the order of a 10-to-1 ratio.”
      https://www.wired.com/story/solar-panels-are-starting-to-die-leaving-behind-toxic-trash/

      Delete
    3. Whoever you are, you are making yourself simply ridiculous. Solar cells contain no toxic materials. Panels contain small amounts of lead that link cells to each other and which will be phased out for the next generation of panels. Can't you make a simple comparison with other technologies which pollute much more than solar PV panels for the same production of energy? Can't you realize that by diffusing this stupid propaganda you are giving a chance to the truly dirty energy technologies to continue polluting around? Please, avoid polluting further the comments of this blog.

      Delete
  4. "the "Savanna Monkeys," aka "homo sapiens".... The monkeys could really do a lot of damage."

    Could? You apparently don't live in reality.

    At the core of homo sapiens is unwisdom (ie, madness) and so the human label of "wise" (ie, sapiens) is a complete collective self-delusion --- study the free scholarly essay “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room" ... https://www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html

    Once you understand that humans are "invisibly" insane (pink elephant people, see cited essay) you'll UNDERSTAND (well, perhaps) why they, especially their alleged experts, perpetually come up with myths and lies about everything ... including about themselves (their nature, their intelligence, their origins, etc).

    "All experts serve the state and the media and only in that way do they achieve their status. Every expert follows his master, for all former possibilities for independence have been gradually reduced to nil by present society’s mode of organization. The most useful expert, of course, is the one who can lie. With their different motives, those who need experts are falsifiers and fools. Whenever individuals lose the capacity to see things for themselves, the expert is there to offer an absolute reassurance." —Guy Debord

    Isn’t it about time for anyone to wake up to the ULTIMATE DEPTH of the human rabbit hole — rather than remain blissfully willfully ignorant in a narcissistic fantasy land and play victim like a little child?

    “Never hide the truth to spare the feelings of the ignorant.” --- Mikhail Bulgakov

    ReplyDelete
  5. can we still make the renewable energy transition without collapse like earth4all says ?

    ReplyDelete